Comments

Thu Sep 1 17:10:02 UTC 1994

I thought you were serious.

Because I agree that most of the big advertisers and content people 
are in fact considering building their own networks.

Marty
> 
> Whoa!!  Sarcasm is so hard these days.  The attached list of 10 is 
> fiction. Pure and Simple.  It was ment to point out that the players
> on the NAPS will change over time and that my PERSONAL impression
> is that the big-boys with Madison Ave backing (obscure US specific 
> reference for advertizing folks) will bury the existing commercial 
> players in the next few years.
> This is only after I have been off my chocolete ration for too long 
> and I am depressed.
> 
> > 
> > I am very glad to see it. Dumb me, no one ever posted it to the other 
> > lists and I think its important,
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Joseph Stroup
> > 
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 1994 bmanning at ISI.EDU wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > 01- RealTimeRUs Net
> > > 02- BlockbusterNet
> > > 03- GameNet
> > > 04- 1900
> > > 05- MJ/PP music&videos
> > > 06- TPCinc
> > > 07- NBC
> > > 08- EDS/RJR
> > > 09- Sprint
> > > 10- MCI
> > > 
> > > Everyone else is next tier as a reseller or vertical niche player.
> > > Or did you not want the 5 year view?
> > > 
> > > --bill
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --bill