SF NAP status (Sprint)

Sat Nov 12 13:16:13 UTC 1994

> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 21:19:39 -0500 (EST) 
> From: Gordon Cook <gcook at tigger.jvnc.net> 
> Subject: Re: SF NAP status 
> To: Frank Liu <fcliu at srv.pacbell.com> 
> Cc: nap-info at merit.edu, nanog at merit.edu, yclee at srv.pacbell.com, 
>         mwfishe at srv.pacbell.com, hhso at srv.pacbell.com, marudik at srv.
>         pacbell.com, cxyuan at srv.pacbell.com, fcliu at srv.pacbell.com, 
>         jmverge at srv.pacbell.com, rcmacie at srv.pacbell.com, kxliu at srv.
>         pacbell.com, 
>         deargue at srv.pacbell.com, 73044.322 at compuserve.com, 
>         0002709394 at mcimail.com 
> In-Reply-To: <9411120158.AA28814 at pop.srv.PacBell.COM> 
> Message-Id: <Pine.3.87.9411112139.A14656-0100000 at tigger.jvnc.net> 
> Mime-Version: 1.0 
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII 
> 
> Two things seem strange.  Why is Sprint only thinking about connecting 
> to the california NAP? I thought it was mandatory for sprint to do so?? 
> Why is sprint late? 
> 

Please be advised, Sprint will connect to all 3 priority NAPs.  The order 
should be received very soon.

Thanks

Bob Collet
Director, Engineering and Operations
Network Systems and Internet Services
Sprint

> 2nd question:  for those of us outside of california...what the heck is 
> the PUC thing all about? 
> 
> 
> 
> ******************************************************************** 
> Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher		Subscr.:  Individ       $85 
> The COOK Report on Internet -> NREN		Non Prof., Gov't & 
> 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618		Small Corp      $175 
> (609) 882-2572					Corp. Site 
> Lic  $500 Internet: gcook at tigger.jvnc.net          Monthly policy & 
> tech news 
> ******************************************************************** 
> 
> 
> 