SF NAP status

Sat Nov 12 02:28:33 UTC 1994

Gordon, I think that question might be better directed at Sprint.

On Nov 11,  9:19pm, Gordon Cook wrote:
} Subject: Re: SF NAP status
} Two things seem strange.  Why is Sprint only thinking about connecting to 
} the california NAP? I thought it was mandatory for sprint to do so?? Why 
} is sprint late?
} 
} 2nd question:  for those of us outside of california...what the heck is 
} the PUC thing all about?
} 
} 
} 
} ********************************************************************
} Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher		Subscr.:  Individ       $85
} The COOK Report on Internet -> NREN		Non Prof., Gov't &
} 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618		Small Corp      $175
} (609) 882-2572					Corp. Site Lic  $500
} Internet: gcook at tigger.jvnc.net          Monthly policy & tech news
} ********************************************************************
} 
} 
}-- End of excerpt from Gordon Cook

-- 
Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob at academ.com
Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: bcm!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.