Jon 'Iain' Boone
boone at prep.net
Tue Nov 1 20:53:24 UTC 1994
On Mon, 31 Oct 1994, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> >cost-effective in a number of applications today. In particular,
> >the cost of wide-area DS-3 ATM services can be very attractive
> >when compared to a number of point-to-point DS-3s.
> TAANSTAFL. You keep forgetting that underneath ATM there are the same
> SONET or clearline DS-3s/OC-3s etc. So, just by using IP routers
> instead of ATM switches you get 30% more bandwidth for the same price.
> ATM does not appear to make economical sense when applied to both
> data and voice communications. So, from the point of view of a user
> purchasing something carriers offer ATM may make sense (if carrier
> does not offer native IP) -- but from the point of view of a carrier
> ATM does not look that attractive.
> You still have to run IP over ATM (there's no such thing as native ATM
> applications yet), and the extra level of encapsulation does not bring
> anything worth 30% of bandwidth.
> In terms of real switching capacity (i.e. user data payload) the new
> generation of IP routers is pretty much close to ATM switches --
> and quite cheaper.
But, if you don't need the full 45 Mb/s, you can find a more
cost-effective solution in the wide-area Fast-packet services. In the
case of the MCI Hyperstream offerings, you don't have to pay for the
full amount of a circuit from point A to point B -- you simply pay a
monthly subscription fee and then a usage charge per Megabyte of data.
So, you can build a multi-megabit/s backbone that is (say) 10 Mb/s and
not end up having to purchase the entirety of the DS3 circuits needed to
More information about the NANOG