ANSnet gated/CIDR Deployment Complete
Mark Knopper
mak at aads.com
Mon Feb 28 01:52:11 UTC 1994
Jordan,
That is excellent news. Congratulations to all on getting this to work.
Time to move on to the next problem?
Mark
>
> All ANSnet AS690 routers are now running gated, and AS690 now supports
> CIDR. All routers are running IBGP4 and SLSP internally, and we are
> peering externally via BGP (using version negotiation for versions
> 2,3,4) and EGP.
>
> For example, any AS690 peer can now reach the CIDR route (192.108.200
> with mask 255.255.248) via ENSS145, ENSS136, or ENSS144:
>
> traceroute to 192.108.200.1 (192.108.200.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 en-0.ans-gw.ans.net (147.225.1.1) 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms
> 2 en-0.enss160.t3.ans.net (192.77.154.2) 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms
> 3 t1-2.New-York-cnss35.t3.ans.net (140.222.35.3) 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms
> 4 mf-0.New-York-cnss32.t3.ans.net (140.222.32.222) 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms
> 5 t3-1.Washington-DC-cnss56.t3.ans.net (140.222.56.2) 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms
> 6 mf-0.Washington-DC-cnss58.t3.ans.net (140.222.56.194) 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms
> 7 t3-0.enss145.t3.ans.net (140.222.145.1) 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms
> 8 192.203.229.245 (192.203.229.245) 12 ms 14 ms 21 ms
> 9 icm-dc-1-S4-T1.icp.net (192.157.65.10) 15 ms 16 ms 15 ms
> 10 Stockholm-EBS1.Ebone.NET (192.121.154.233) 199 ms 205 ms 203 ms
> 11 Stupi-RBS1-IXF.Ebone.NET (192.108.204.10) 137 ms 135 ms 136 ms
> 12 Strul.Stupi.SE (192.108.200.1) 136 ms 137 ms 136 ms
>
> Because the AS690 configuration for more CIDR aggregates has not yet
> been done, we have left AS690 pointing default to AS1133 for now. The
> CIDR configuration process for aggregates on AS690 should begin early
> next week. The AS690 default route will be removed when the CIDR
> routes (for which class-based routes are not being announced) have
> been configured.
>
>
> Rcp_Routed (1987 - 1994)
> ========================
> The last rcp_routed daemon on ANSnet was killed by Curtis
> Villamizar on CNSS8 (San Francisco) on Feb. 27th at 03:13EST.
> Many thanks are owed to Curtis Villamizar, Steve Heimlich, and
> Yakov Rekhter for their work on rcp_routed over the years.
>
> We would also like to thank the regional-techs, and BGP deployment
> communities for helping us to successfully coordinate this gated
> deployment over the last several months.
>
>
> Details on Sunday Feb. 27th 00:30EST Gated Deployment
> =====================================================
> We automatically restarted the new gated binary (ANS1.0) using the
> new gated config. files using an automated script on the following
> nodes already running gated: ENSS205, ENSS194, ENSS160,
> ENSS131(1.0o), ENSS139, CNSS104, CNSS105, CNSS107,
> ENSS138, ENSS136(1.0o), CNSS120, ENSS158, ENSS145(1.0o),
> ENSS132(1.0o), ENSS186, ENSS213, ENSS224, CNSS72, CNSS75,
> ENSS150, ENSS151, CNSS88, CNSS91, ENSS143(1.0o), ENSS176,
> ENSS193, ENSS164, ENSS222, ENSS226, ENSS230,
> ENSS134(1.0o), ENSS144(1.0o), CNSS40, CNSS41, CNSS43
> CNSS44 ENSS168, ENSS190, CNSS80, CNSS81, CNSS83,
> ENSS140, ENSS129(1.0o), ENSS135(1.0o)
>
> We then started gated (ANS1.0) on the following nodes for the first
> time:
>
> Hartford: E133(1.0o), C48, C49, C51
> Cleveland: E212
> New York: C32, C33, C35, C36, E209, E177, E155, E137, E163
> Denver: C96, C97, C99, E141, E142
> D.C.: C56, C58, C57(1.0o), C59, E146, E236
> Houston: C64, C65, C67, E211, E188, E174, E183, E165
> Albuquerque: C112, E179, E191, E172
> Los Angeles: C16, C19
> Chicago: C24, C25, C27, E130, E152
> San Fran.: C8, C9, C11, E128(1.0o), E229
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list