Problems with BARRNET network 220.127.116.11
curtis at ans.net
Tue Apr 12 22:59:19 UTC 1994
> Is it useful to add Class-B-Subnets to the routing table whilst we are
> trying to reduce Class-C entries?
> This was an oversight. We are sending the subnet routes to ENSS128 in order
> to insure correct next-hop resolution across our DMZ network. These subnets
> should not have been sent to other external peers and no longer will be.
> Vince Fuller/BARRNet
These must be going through another AS path. AS 690 blocks further
redistribution of your more specific routes. Does anyone have an AS
path for these routes?
More information about the NANOG