Supernet block sizes - recommendations?

Tim Salo tjs at
Fri May 14 14:35:49 UTC 1993

> From: aggarwal at (Vikas Aggarwal)
> Subject: Re: Supernet block sizes - recommendations?
> To: Daniel.Karrenberg at (Daniel Karrenberg)
> Date: Fri, 14 May 93 9:28:44 EDT
> Cc: regional-techs at, local-ir at
> 	[...]
> Usually these arguments do the trick-- its a matter of technical sense
> prevailing over 'I want a class B' pride.

We ought to have a better response to the claim: "I want a class B to
improve performance, (because I can easily make my UNIX software use larger


More information about the NANOG mailing list