[Nanog-futures] New Membership-WG Draft

Duane Wessels wessels at packet-pushers.com
Wed Oct 27 21:51:17 UTC 2010

On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:39 PM, kris foster wrote:

> I see things like this as a fail safe, and not a requirement that the board consider each individual individually.

I agree with Kris.  While I wish that we could simply say that there are
no formal qualifications for membership, I think the language is necessary
to (1) define membership for legal reasons and (2) as a way for the
organization to protect itself from potential outside influences should
that ever be necessary.

From a practical standpoint I think anyone who wants to become a member
will, in all likelihood, be granted membership.

(speaking only for myself)

More information about the Nanog-futures mailing list