Backward Compatibility Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
Abraham Y. Chen
aychen at avinta.com
Mon Jan 15 04:18:37 UTC 2024
Hi, Randy:
1) " ... unfortunately i already had grey hair in the '90s and was in
the room for all this, ... ":
My apologies! For an uninitiated, I misread your message as if IPv6
was originally designed with a plan to assure smooth transition from IPv4.
Regards,
Abe (2024-01-14 23:17)
On 2024-01-12 17:45, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Perhaps you are too young to realize that the original IPv6 plan was
>> not designed to be backward compatible to IPv4, and Dual-Stack was
>> developed (through some iterations) to bridge the transition between
>> IPv4 and IPv6? You may want to spend a few moments to read some
>> history on this.
> ROFL!!! if there is anything you can do to make me that young, you
> could have a very lucrative career outside of the internet.
>
> hint: unfortunately i already had grey hair in the '90s and was in the
> room for all this, and spent a few decades managing to get some of the
> worst stupidities (TLA, NLA, ...) pulled out of the spec. at iij, we
> rolled ipv6 on the backbone in 1997.
>
> randy
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20240114/401b5463/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list