starlink ixp peering progress

Warren Kumari warren at kumari.net
Tue Feb 27 17:19:20 UTC 2024


Or this: https://bgp.tools/as/14593#peers


Personally I find bgp.tools to be the friendliest…

I realize that this thread is turning into an <aol>Me too!</aol> type
thread, but it does seem useful to share which tools work best for each of
us…

W



On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:33 AM, Marco Davids <nanog at nanog.org> wrote:

> Or this?
>
> https://bgp.he.net/AS14593#_peers6
>
> Op 27/02/2024 om 13:17 schreef borg at uu3.net:
>
> Well, for some basic overview you can use CAIDA AS rank.
>
> You can use it directly, or you may try my (more user friendly) frontend
> for it: http://as-rank.uu3.net/?as=14593
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
>
> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> To: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: starlink ixp peering progress
> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:54:44 -0500
>
> One of the things I learned today was that starlink has published an
> extensive guide as to how existing BGP AS holders can peer with them to get
> better service.
>
> https://starlink-enterprise-guide.readme.io/docs/peering-with-starlink
>
> I am curious if there is a way to see how many have peered already, how
> many they could actually peer with?, and progress over time since
> inception.... what would be the right tools for that? This is pretty
> impressive for peering so far:
>
> https://www.peeringdb.com/net/18747
>
> Is there a better email list to discuss ixp stuff?
>
> --
> Marco
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20240227/1eff8d3c/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list