Peering Contact at AS16509

Tue Feb 20 06:58:59 UTC 2024

Even if you don’t meet the port speed requirements for a PNI, there is
likely something that could work via an IX.

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:57 PM Tim Burke <tim at mid.net> wrote:

> We reached out some time ago using the contact on PeeringDB and had no
> issue, but the amount of transit consumed to get to 16509 is substantial
> enough to make responding worth their while.
>
> Their minimum peering is 100G, with 400G preferred, so it’s very possible
> that if you’re not consuming anywhere close to 100G, the lack of response
> could correlate to a lack of interest on their side.
>
> > On Feb 18, 2024, at 13:09, Peter Potvin via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > If a contact who manages North American peering at AS16509 could reach
> out off-list, that would be appreciated. Myself and a few colleagues have
> attempted to reach out via the contacts listed on PeeringDB on multiple
> occasions over the last couple of months and have not been successful in
> reaching someone.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Peter Potvin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20240220/8b0f5441/attachment.html>