maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

Fri Sep 29 04:14:58 UTC 2023

IMO, No. ipv4 is not dead yet. we need to raise it, a bit.

EINAT solutions are OK

The future will come very quickly, right now.

We just need to invest in the internet.

29.09.2023 07:11 tarihinde Owen DeLong yazdı:
> Wouldn’t /48s be a better solution to this need?
>
> Owen
>
>
>> On Sep 28, 2023, at 14:25, VOLKAN SALİH <volkan.salih.06 at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> hello,
>>
>> I believe, ISPs should also allow ipv4 prefixes with length between 
>> /25-/27 instead of limiting maximum length to /24..
>>
>> I also believe that RIRs and LIRs should allocate /27s which has 32 
>> IPv4 address. considering IPv4 world is now mostly NAT'ed, 32 IPv4s 
>> are sufficient for most of the small and medium sized organizations 
>> and also home office workers like youtubers, and professional gamers 
>> and webmasters!
>>
>> It is because BGP research and experiment networks can not get /24 
>> due to high IPv4 prices, but they have to get an IPv4 prefix to learn 
>> BGP in IPv4 world.
>>
>> What do you think about this?
>>
>> What could be done here?
>>
>> Is it unacceptable; considering most big networks that do 
>> full-table-routing also use multi-core routers with lots of RAM? 
>> those would probably handle /27s and while small networks mostly use 
>> default routing, it should be reasonable to allow /25-/27?
>>
>> Thanks for reading, regards..
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230929/03a3acbb/attachment.html>