maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?
Justin Wilson (Lists)
lists at mtin.net
Tue Oct 3 18:56:27 UTC 2023
I think it is going to have to happen. We have several folks on the IX and various consulting clients who only need 3-6 Ips but have to burn a full /24 to participate in BGP. I wrote a blog post awhile back on this topic https://blog.j2sw.com/data-center/unpopular-opinion-bgp-should-accept-smaller-than-a-24/
Justin Wilson
j2sw at mtin.net
—
https://j2sw.com (AS399332)
https://blog.j2sw.com - Podcast and Blog
> On Sep 30, 2023, at 1:48 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>
>> About 60% of the table is /24 routes.
>> Just going to /25 will probably double the table size.
>
> or maybe just add 60%, not 100%. and it would take time.
>
> agree it would be quite painful. would rather not go there. sad to
> say, i suspect some degree of lengthening is inevitable. we have
> ourselves to blame; but blame does not move packets.
>
> randy, who was in the danvers cabal for the /19 agreement
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20231003/0e02ecd9/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list