AS37468 (Angola Cables) - Route Leak?
Phil Lavin
phil.lavin at vonage.com
Thu May 25 16:23:48 UTC 2023
Thanks for the efforts, Mark.
Tricky for me to check as the one known/testable traffic path was fixed by AWS around 12:27 UTC - they rejected prefixes from Angola Cables in LAX and Singapore.
That said, I see from the Kentik folks that it appears to have been resolved at 12:42 UTC: https://twitter.com/DougMadory/status/1661723901519380481 <https://twitter.com/DougMadory/status/1661723901519380481>
> On 25 May 2023, at 17:13, Mark Tinka <mark at tinka.africa> wrote:
>
> Angola Cable say they have fixed the issue.
>
> Can you please check again and verify? Thanks.
>
> Mark.
>
> On 5/25/23 14:36, Phil Lavin wrote:
>> Thanks, Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 25 May 2023, at 13:34, Mark Tinka <mark at tinka.africa <mailto:mark at tinka.africa>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've reached out to some known folk at Angola Cables. Will let you know if I hear back.
>>>
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>> On 5/25/23 14:01, Phil Lavin via NANOG wrote:
>>>> Cross-posting from outages list:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Seeing massive packet loss on routes from AWS to Hetzner today. First was AWS USW2 -> Hetzner (e.g. 88.99.88.69).
>>>>
>>>> Traffic was transiting via AS37468 (Angola Cables) in Coresite IX.
>>>>
>>>> Now got loss from AWS apse1/apse2. Traffic transiting via AS37468 on Equinix IX.
>>>>
>>>> I e-mailed Hetzner NOC but they don’t seem entirely bothered, currently.
>>>>
>>>> My traceroute [v0.94]
>>>> jcasc-rtc01 (10.36.21.252) -> phil.lavin.me.uk <http://lavin.me.uk/> 2023-05-25T11:50:13+0000
>>>> Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
>>>> Packets Pings
>>>> Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
>>>> 1. ip-10-36-17-199.ap-southeast- 0.0% 18 0.1 0.6 0.1 7.7 1.8
>>>> 2. ec2-18-141-171-15.ap-southeas 0.0% 18 4.3 17.5 0.9 95.7 24.0
>>>> ec2-18-141-171-1.ap-southeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com <http://ec2-18-141-171-1.ap-southeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com/>
>>>> 3. (waiting for reply)
>>>> 4. (waiting for reply)
>>>> 5. (waiting for reply)
>>>> 6. (waiting for reply)
>>>> 7. (waiting for reply)
>>>> 8. 100.65.10.161 0.0% 17 0.6 1.4 0.3 9.6 2.4
>>>> 100.65.11.65
>>>> 9. 150.222.108.75 0.0% 17 2.1 3.0 1.0 13.1 3.3
>>>> 52.93.10.74
>>>> 10. 150.222.108.82 0.0% 17 2.2 2.4 1.3 10.2 2.1
>>>> 11. 52.93.11.115 0.0% 17 5.8 2.4 1.2 9.7 2.5
>>>> 52.93.10.185
>>>> 12. 37468-sg1-ix.equinix.com <http://37468-sg1-ix.equinix.com/> 68.8% 17 268.6 279.0 262.4 312.8 19.8
>>>> 13. 102.219.127.3 93.8% 17 420.0 420.0 420.0 420.0 0.0
>>>> 14. (waiting for reply)
>>>> 15. 195.66.227.209 62.5% 17 467.9 456.9 440.3 488.2 18.5
>>>> 16. core6.par.hetzner.com <http://core6.par.hetzner.com/> 75.0% 17 455.6 464.1 455.6 486.3 14.8
>>>> 17. core11.nbg1.hetzner.com <http://core11.nbg1.hetzner.com/> 75.0% 17 459.5 467.5 445.9 497.3 21.8
>>>> 18. core23.fsn1.hetzner.com <http://core23.fsn1.hetzner.com/> 68.8% 17 478.4 441.0 390.0 478.4 32.0
>>>> 19. ex9k1.dc1.fsn1.hetzner.com <http://ex9k1.dc1.fsn1.hetzner.com/> 87.5% 17 460.4 454.2 448.1 460.4 8.7
>>>> 20. vmh02.lavin.me.uk <http://vmh02.lavin.me.uk/> 75.0% 17 433.3 424.2 382.7 441.9 27.9
>>>> 21. (waiting for reply)
>>>> 22. http-lb-01.lavin.me.uk <http://http-lb-01.lavin.me.uk/> 75.0% 17 436.8 438.6 385.0 493.3 44.2
>>>>
>>>> I’ve been out of the BGP game for a few years now. Anybody have visibility of the extent of the leaks?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230525/babbc9af/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list