Congrats to AS701

John Covici covici at ccs.covici.com
Thu Jun 16 02:14:33 UTC 2022


The tech support of Verizon, don't know anything about ipv6.  The
business reps have never heard of it, either.

On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:54:17 -0400,
Dave Taht wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 6:09 PM Christopher Morrow
> <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:00 PM Justin Streiner <streinerj at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I might call Verizon and ask about v6 availability as I periodically do.  I'll check if I see anything different on my gear later today.  I have a GPON business service with static IPv4 at one location and an older BPON business service with static IPv4 in another location.
> >>
> >
> > As a short and not totally complete update to this problem... A 'long time listener, first time caller' sort of person
> > noted to me off-list that:
> >   "Hey, once upon a time I dealt with hardware/vendor things... and we wouldn't send 'RA type' packets (solicits/etc)
> >     down the customer leg UNLESS they had already sent a RouterSolicitation... on the BNG platform."
> >
> > So... I copy/pasta'd some comcast facing config and.. low and behold my link sends me a /56 if I ask for one via PD!
> > for <reasons that include chris is holding it wrong> I can't personally use the v6 (yet) here, but this is super encouraging!
> >
> > Perhaps this is 'CPE configuration away' from working in a bunch more places?
> 
> Well, in a FIOS location[1] with the most ancient fios provided CPE I
> know of (at least 10 years old), connected to a modern day openwrt
> router, it's been putting out dhcpv6 solicits with no response for
> roughly... 10 years.
> 
> It would be great if there was someone to call at FIOS about what gear
> will be v6 capable. This router also happens to have my longest
> running hurricane electric ipv6 tunnel.
> 
> Never did I imagine 10+ years ago that tunnel would still be in operation.
> 
> [1] http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=4162
> >
> > -chris
> >
> >>
> >> Thank you
> >> jms
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:18 AM Nimrod Levy <nimrodl at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Also, it doesn't seem to be enabled on ports that have static ipv4
> >>>
> >>> but progress is progress. we'll take it.
> >>>
> >>> Nimrod
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:17 AM Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Still no IPv6 in Westchester County, NY ☹
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Great sign though, maybe NY will get it eventually
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+mhuff=ox.com at nanog.org> On Behalf Of Joe Loiacono
> >>>> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 10:55 AM
> >>>> To: nanog at nanog.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: Congrats to AS701
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> FiOS from Maryland (anonymized):
> >>>>
> >>>> enp3s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
> >>>>         inet 192.168.1.164  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
> >>>>         inet6 fe80::b104:8f4d:e5b2:e13b  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
> >>>>         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:a9b1:5f59:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x0<global>
> >>>>         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:24a8:7b31:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x0<global>
> >>>>         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:e1b6:8b83:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x0<global>
> >>>>         ether d0:67:e5:23:ec:fe  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
> >>>>         RX packets 2518066  bytes 1448982813 (1.4 GB)
> >>>>         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
> >>>>         TX packets 2157395  bytes 260073952 (260.0 MB)
> >>>>         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
> >>>>
> >>>> a at b:~$ ping 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a
> >>>> PING 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a(2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a) 56 data bytes
> >>>> 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=24.0 ms
> >>>> 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=17.6 ms
> >>>> 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=20.4 ms
> >>>> 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=23.4 ms
> >>>> ^C
> >>>> --- 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a ping statistics ---
> >>>> 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
> >>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.618/21.351/23.983/2.555 ms
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/12/2022 1:55 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 11:03 PM Darrel Lewis (darlewis) <darlewis at cisco.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I, for one, am having a hard time finding the proper words to express the joy that I am feeling at this momentous moment!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It's quite amazing, I think... that it's taken so long to get to deployment you can actually see on the fios plant :)
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd note I can't see the below on my homestead, but I can at a relative's (where the ifconfig data is from).
> >>>>
> >>>> I also can't tell if the upstream will PD a block to the downstream... and the VZ CPE is 'not something I want to fiddle with',
> >>>>
> >>>> because everytime I have tried at my house I've just taken it out behind the woodshed with a maul... and replaced it with
> >>>>
> >>>> something I CAN configure successfully. (plus.. don't want that TR 069 in my home...)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -chris
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Darrel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 11, 2022, at 7:05 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> 
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like FIOS customers may be getting ipv6 deployed toward them, finally:
> >>>>
> >>>> ifconfig snippet from local machine:
> >>>>         inet6 2600:4040:2001:2200:73d2:6bcc:1e6b:43a1  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x0<global>
> >>>>         inet6 2600:4040:2001:2200:e87:bf36:b6cb:6ce1  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x0<global>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ping attempt:
> >>>>
> >>>>   64 bytes from bh-in-f106.1e100.net (2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=8.71 ms
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 8ms from mclean, va to ashburn, va isn't wondrous, but at least it's ipv6 (and marginally faster than ipv4)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Congrats to the 701 folk for deploying more widely!
> >>>>
> >>>>   (note: I don't know exactly when this started, nor how wide it really is, but progress here is welcomed by myself at least :) )
> >>>>
> >>>> -chris
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> 

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici wb2una
         covici at ccs.covici.com


More information about the NANOG mailing list