Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported

James R Cutler james.cutler at consultant.com
Fri Apr 1 14:06:30 UTC 2022


On Mar 31, 2022, at 11:51 PM, Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> 
> Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
>> It still suffers from a certain amount of opacity across administrative domains.
> 
> So, if an IPv6 prefix is assigned to an apartment building and
> the building has no logging mechanism on how addresses are used
> within the building, the problem of audit trail opacity is
> suffered.
> 
> Thank you very much to have proven IPv6 useless.
> 
> 						Masataka Ohta

You appear to attribute to IPv6 a problem due to building management. Please explain how IPv6 is “useless” by some other measure that that of building management errors.


More information about the NANOG mailing list