IPv6 woes - RFC

Tue Sep 14 12:37:47 UTC 2021

8+8 came *MUCH* later than that, and really wasn't ready for prime 
time.  The reason we know that is that work was the basis of LISP and 
ILNP.  Yes, standing on the shoulders of giants.  And there certainly 
were poor design decisions in IPv6, bundling IPsec being one.  But the 
idea that operators were ignored?  Feh.

On 14.09.21 14:10, Randy Bush wrote:
> and 8+8, variable length, ... just didn't happen, eh?
>
> the nice thing about revisionist history is that anybody can play.
>
> randy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210914/a1b24db1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210914/a1b24db1/attachment.sig>