Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

• Previous message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Keller" <justincompsci at gmail.com>

> I'd be fine if newish devices use it like a 1918 but I don't think
> it's worth the headache and difficulty of making it globally routed.
> Maybe  Amazon could use it too

I could be wrong, but I don't think expanding 1918 was the goal of these 
proponents....

Cheers,
-- jra

> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 6:31 PM Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
>>
>> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html
>>
>> That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's just
>> me.  So many things are just me.
>>
>> [ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ]
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -- jra
>>
>> --
>> Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
>> Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
>> Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info
> > St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274

-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274

• Previous message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]