Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

Sat Mar 20 19:30:01 UTC 2021

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:07 PM Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
> in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
> it being the de facto global anything-ops list.  perhaps we do not
> need to fix that.
>
> randy
>
>
> +1 (or as much more as I can be credited for)

..Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210320/64c5a181/attachment.html>