RIPE NCC Executive Board election

Ryan Hamel ryan at rkhtech.org
Wed May 13 22:04:04 UTC 2020


Elad,

It's those kinds of quick accusations that are damaging your reputation.
To boil your three ideas down to a sentence, they're throwing pixie dust on top of existing technologies, instead of embracing the current feature set that has existed for decades.
I mentioned BCP38 as a method around spoofed DDOS attacks on RIPE, and your IPv4+ idea is only keeping IPv4 around longer than it should.
IPv6 has been around for decades, and battle tested with major companies like Digital Equipment Corporation in the 90's. If you want your ideas to gain any sort of foothold, write the code demonstrating a proof of concept with a couple of Linux VMs, showing off the client and router changes, and release it for the community to play around with.
Actions speak louder than words. Just like RIPE votes, and listing your email address as spam.
Have a good one.
Ryan Hamel
On May 13 2020, at 2:39 pm, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:35 PM Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io> wrote:
> >
> > Another member of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project".
> wait, what?
> > ________________________________
> > From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:34 AM
> > To: Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io>
> > Cc: David Hubbard <dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com>; nanog at nanog.org <nanog at nanog.org>
> > Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
> >
> > admins, can we can this worm can back and .. get back to work ?
> > kthxbi.
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:29 PM Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be deployed.
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM
> > > To: nanog at nanog.org <nanog at nanog.org>
> > > Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
> > >
> > >
> > > I suspect he’d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4 because any extension of IPv4 use makes the netblocks’s he’s obtained questionable ‘ownership’ of more valuable, in theory.
> > >
> > >
> > > From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus.com at nanog.org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>
> > > Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM
> > > To: "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>
> > > Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traffic.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Some internet service providers may have more than half of their traffic as IPv6.
> > >
> > >
> > > Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to abandon the work already done?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200513/28e44095/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list