Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network

Sun Mar 15 07:55:01 UTC 2020

>
> Most countries in Africa do not implement great big firewalls. Our
> problems are quite different :-\...
>

I know Caida has one paper on the congestion on Africa's IXPs substrate.
However, we did find Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa have better
transnational performance than China, while the performance of Ghana and
Egypt was worse than China, at least that's what we saw from the web4africa
VPSes we brought.

We've seen somewhat similar behaviour from these networks when peering
> outside of China
>

Sorry I am a bit confused here. What do you mean by "these networks"? When
you say "peering outside of China", who is peering who exactly?

Best,
Pengxiong Zhu
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University of California, Riverside

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:17 AM Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

>
>
> On 3/Mar/20 00:57, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
>
> >
> > Prices are set artificially high, so their interconnection partners
> > wont purchase enough capacity. additionally, the three don't
> > purchase enough to cover demand for their own network. Results in
> > congestion.
>
> We've seen somewhat similar behaviour from these networks when peering
> outside of China, perhaps, to influence the flow of money and traffic.
>
> We have zero patience for such things.
>
> Mark.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200315/aa74fddb/attachment.html>