IPv6 Unique Local Addresses (was Re: New Active Exploit: memcached on port 11211 UDP & TCP being exploited for reflection attacks)

• Previous message (by thread): [NANOG-announce] Program Committee appointments
• Next message (by thread): IPv6 Unique Local Addresses (was Re: New Active Exploit: memcached on port 11211 UDP & TCP being exploited for reflection attacks)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 1 March 2018 at 15:18, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

> Second, RFC-1918 doesn’t apply to IPv6 at all, and (fortunately) hardly
> anyone
> uses ULA (the IPv6 analogue to RFC-1918).
>

Wait. What's the objection to ULA? Is it just that NAT is bad, or is there
something new?

-- 
Harald

• Previous message (by thread): [NANOG-announce] Program Committee appointments
• Next message (by thread): IPv6 Unique Local Addresses (was Re: New Active Exploit: memcached on port 11211 UDP & TCP being exploited for reflection attacks)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]