Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Fri Dec 8 20:02:24 UTC 2017
Previous message (by thread):
Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
Next message (by thread):
Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Nothing wrong with using xxx.0 or xxx::0 in the context of a host route (/32 or /128).
Previous message (by thread):
Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
Next message (by thread):
Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the NANOG mailing list