Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
Mike Hammett
nanog at ics-il.net
Tue Dec 5 18:29:21 UTC 2017
I'm replacing an M10i with a CHR.
I hope you have a newer RE so that you don't have worse BGP convergence than a CCR.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike lyon" <mike.lyon at gmail.com>
To: tony at wicks.co.nz
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 12:11:27 PM
Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
Unfortunately, yes. Thats why two Juniper M7is just arrived on my doorstep yesterday...
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:10, <tony at wicks.co.nz> <tony at wicks.co.nz> wrote:
>
> Is that actually still true nowadays ? Of course there is always the option of running RouterOS on an X86 for an effective solution as well.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mike.lyon at gmail.com [mailto:mike.lyon at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 7:07 AM
> To: tony at wicks.co.nz
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
>
> Bad thing about the CCRs is that their BGP process is single threaded. So even though it has a bunch of cores, it doesn’t utilize them for BGP.
>
> -Mike
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list