Providing transit to unallocated networks

Alistair Mackenzie magicsata at gmail.com
Wed Sep 28 00:46:29 UTC 2016


Thanks for this, it shows as

apnic|ZZ|ipv4|103.***.***.0|1024|20160927|reserved||e-stats

I expect this still stands with it being reserved?


William, it's 100% an apnic range and shows no org and is registered
to the APNIC Hostmaster. This applies for both the ASN and the address
space.


On 28 September 2016 at 01:28, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've come across a network which seem to be getting transit yet both the
> > ASN and IP space is not allocated by the RIR.
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> There is still unicast address space that isn't allocated by any RIR?
>
> Seriously though, check all your bases. Is not the space unallocated
> by all RIRs or just the one you expect to hold it?  If you have a
> transit provider that's not playing by the rules, contact their
> transit providers to complain and if you still don't get satisfaction,
> I'd name and shame the lot of them. Failure to filter bad actors is
> how prefix hijacking happens.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
>
> --
> William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
>
>
On 28 September 2016 at 01:36, George Michaelson <ggm at algebras.org> wrote:

> check if the block is in this file.
>
> http://labs.apnic.net/delegated-nro-extended
>
> If not, then the block is hijacked or being abused.
>
> the file format is a bit obscure: the ipv4 record is base-ip|hostcount
> but converting that to prefix length is pretty simple.
>
> -G
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Alistair Mackenzie
> <magicsata at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've come across a network which seem to be getting transit yet both the
> > ASN and IP space is not allocated by the RIR. It does appear at some
> point
> > that it was valid however this is no longer the case.
> >
> > The network is single homed and I tried asking the transit provider what
> > their policy was on this but got no answer.
> >
> > Has anyone seen anything like this? What has happened in the past with
> > things like this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alistair
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list