Lightower (ASN:46887) RTBH community info

Hugo Slabbert hugo at slabnet.com
Mon Sep 26 19:35:15 UTC 2016


Backwards from what you want (sorted by provider rather than supported 
"feature" e.g. RTBH), but:

http://onesc.net/communities/

fwiw

-- 
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal

On Mon 2016-Sep-26 14:23:10 -0500, George Skorup <george at cbcast.com> wrote:

>Windstream: 7029:4507
>GTT: 3257:2666
>
>are the two I know of.
>
>On 9/26/2016 1:58 PM, Nick Ellermann wrote:
>>I would love to know which ISP's support RTBH? We have struggled to get anyone to support communities. If their website says they do, their NOC sure doesn't know it or agree... I don't want to list names here, but truly we would love RTBH capabilities with our upstreams.
>>
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>Nick Ellermann – CTO & VP Cloud Services
>>BroadAspect
>>E: nellermann at broadaspect.com
>>P: 703-297-4639
>>F: 703-996-4443
>>THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Crocker
>>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 1:33 PM
>>To: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
>>Subject: Lightower (ASN:46887) RTBH community info
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Does anyone know the RTBH community for Lightower?  I’ve tried 46887:666 but that doesn’t work.   I have a /32 I need to blackhole, Lightower is the last ISP and it doesn’t appear they support RTBH ☹
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>-Matt
>>
>>--
>>Matthew Crocker
>>President – Crocker Communications
>>matthew at corp.crocker.com<mailto:matthew at corp.crocker.com>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160926/b67c3f9e/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list