Request for comment -- BCP38

Mon Sep 26 16:37:05 UTC 2016

On Mon 2016-Sep-26 12:25:58 -0400, John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

>>>>I gather the usual customer response to this is "if you don't want our
>>>>$50K/mo, I'm sure we can find another ISP who does."
>
>>I myself am talking about the latter and included the option of PI 
>>space to cover that (although I guess at some point this can be 
>>made fly with PA space from another provider if both providers are 
>>willing enough to play ball), though from the $50/mo figure John 
>>listed, I'm assuming he's talking about the latter.
>
>Who said $50/mo?

Apparently I need even more caffeine that I first imagined...

If we're talking about networks with that kind of MRC, is it really that 
far of a stretch to require PI space for this?  Then again:  If we're 
talking about that kind of MRC, then I'm assuming ISP A can be coaxed to 
allow explicit and well-defined exceptions on the customer's links.

This discussion started wrt to COTS dual-ISP routers though, as mentioned 
in Ken Chase's message, no?  Where I'm assuming we're talking about 
mom-and-pop operations rather than a $50K/mo business account.

>
>Regards,
>John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
>Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

-- 
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160926/1eeef3ca/attachment.sig>