PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses

Mark Andrews marka at isc.org
Wed Sep 21 01:34:57 UTC 2016


Mark Andrews writes:
> 
> In message <09342130-874F-4FA4-B410-B7B66A75FA4D at mtin.net>, Justin Wilson wri
> te
> s:
> > PSN is one reason I am not a fan of CGNAT. All they see are tons of
> > connections from the same IP.  This results in them banning folks.  Due
> > to them being hacked so many times getting them to actually communicate
> > is almost impossible.  My .02 is just get the gamers a true public if at
> > all possible.
> >
> > Justin Wilson
> > j2sw at mtin.net
> 
> What we need is business tech reporters to continually report on
> these failures of content providers to deliver their services over
> IPv6.  20 years lead time should be enough for any service.

Additionally is the a role for the SEC in ensuring that companies
take IPv6 seriously?  If I remember correctly they got involved
with Y2K.  Just because there isn't a hard date it doesn't mean
that IPv6 is any less important than Y2K to your business's survival.

> Mark
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org



More information about the NANOG mailing list