Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?

Thu Oct 27 16:47:57 UTC 2016

In a message written on Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:03:11AM -0700, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> For the last couple of weeks, every single abuse mail I've tried to send
> to networks in a very short list of countries has bounced back with
> "mailbox exceeds quota".  I take this to mean that there isn't someone
> actively reading, acting on, and deleting e-mail from abuse@<whomever>.

Are there any ISP's left that read and respond to abuse@ in a timely
fashion?  I haven't seen one in at least a decade.  Maybe I e-mail the
wrong ones.

-- 
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20161027/b68fff79/attachment.sig>