Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Ca By cb.list6 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 15:00:16 UTC 2016


On Tuesday, June 7, 2016, Cryptographrix <cryptographrix at gmail.com> wrote:

> Very true - I was being a bit extremist out of frustration, but I think
> you're spot on - he.net tunnels and even 6to4 are toys to provide IPv6
> support, not actually IPv6 support.
>
> And I'm quite frustrated because there's so little actual v6 support, and
> I *do* actually need it on a daily basis for work.
>
> Because there's no actual ISP IPv6 support anywhere else (in parts of the
> US that *have* multiple ISPs), you can't even make the case to your ISP
> that it's a legitimate requirement for you because they know you're not
> really going to get v6 elsewhere.
>
>
I think we have different definitions of "no actual isp ipv6 support"

Again, a helpful akamai blog
https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/four-years-since-world-ipv6-launch-entering-the-mainstream.html

fixed line: Comcast, AT&T, TWC, just to name the largest in the nation have
meaningful deployments of ipv6. The only thing holding back greater
deployment for those networks are legacy CPE that will age out slowly.

All 4 of the national mobile operator have ipv6 default on for most
new phone models.

Yes, many gaps to fill still. But, on "my network" with shy of 70 million
users, everything has ipv6 except the iPhone, and that will change RSN. And
for users with v6, the majority of their traffic is ipv6 e2e since the
whales (google, fb, netflix, increasingly Akamai) are dual stack.

CB


>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:22 AM Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cb.list6 at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016, Cryptographrix <cryptographrix at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cryptographrix at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> As I said to Netflix's tech support - if they advocate for people to turn
>>> off IPv6 on their end, maybe Netflix should stop supporting it on their
>>> end.
>>>
>>> It's in the air whether it's just an HE tunnel issue or an IPv6 issue at
>>> the moment, and if their tech support is telling people to turn off IPv6,
>>> maybe they should just instead remove their AAAA records.
>>>
>>> (or fail back to ipv4 when v6 looks like a tunnel)
>>>
>>>
>> I think you need to reset your expectations of a free tunnel service.
>>
>> he.net tunnels are a toy for geeks looking to play with v6. In terms of
>> Netflix subcriber base, it is amazing insignificant number of users.
>>
>> At the end of the day, anonymous tunnels, just like linux, are not
>> supported by Netflix. And, he.net tunnel users are hurting ipv6 overall
>> just like 6to4 by injecting FUD and other nonesense complexity.... For a
>> toy.
>>
>> Move on to a real issue instead of beating this dead horse.
>>
>> CB
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM Mark Felder <feld at feld.me> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > > On Jun 6, 2016, at 22:25, Spencer Ryan <sryan at arbor.net> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > The tunnelbroker service acts exactly like a VPN. It allows you,
>>> from any
>>> > > arbitrary location in the world with an IPv4 address, to bring
>>> traffic
>>> > out
>>> > > via one of HE's 4 POP's, while completely masking your actual
>>> location.
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Perhaps Netflix should automatically block any connection that's not
>>> from
>>> > a known residential ISP or mobile ISP as anything else could be a
>>> server
>>> > someone is proxying through. It's very easy to get these subnets -- the
>>> > spam filtering folks have these subnets well documented. /s
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >   Mark Felder
>>> >   feld at feld.me
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>



More information about the NANOG mailing list