IPv6 is better than ipv4

Thu Jun 2 15:46:58 UTC 2016

CenturyTel in this area provides IPv6 to DSL customers.

Thank you,
- Nich

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 10:43 AM
> To: Christopher Morrow
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
> 
> Just a thought - ipv4 includes older more rural connections such as 1M
> DSL out in the sticks.  That weighs the average connection time down.
> v6 being capable on modern 4G wireless and fiber connections makes the
> average faster.
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Morrow
> <morrowc.lists at gmail.com
> > wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-
> networ
> > ks-why-and-how.html
> > >
> > > Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well over
> > > 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference corroborating
> > > studies from Linkedin and Facebook.
> > >
> > > Fair to ask your business 1) does mobile performance matter 2) are
> > > you taking advantage of this 10% page load speedup that ipv6
> provides?
> > >
> >
> > srs question: "What percentage of the mobile world prefers v6 over
> v4?"
> >
> > I ask because perhaps the market for your app is such that v6 is
> > actually a hinderance to the userbase... (or is slower in your
> market)
> >
> > Are there more holistic studies about this?
> >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4845 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160602/cbcce0e6/attachment.bin>