Latency & Packet Loss Level 3 to Russia

Joe Flowers jflowers at atlassian.com
Mon Jul 18 17:24:46 UTC 2016


Things look ok from here:

 2  216.182.224.138 (216.182.224.138)  50.787 ms  50.775 ms  50.773 ms
 3  100.66.8.180 (100.66.8.180)  14.457 ms 100.66.8.190 (100.66.8.190)
 14.991 ms 100.66.8.170 (100.66.8.170)  14.833 ms
 4  100.66.11.160 (100.66.11.160)  16.969 ms 100.66.11.192
(100.66.11.192)  33.043 ms 100.66.11.134 (100.66.11.134)  20.515 ms
 5  100.66.6.47 (100.66.6.47)  20.337 ms 100.66.6.203 (100.66.6.203)
18.458 ms 100.66.6.227 (100.66.6.227)  17.512 ms
 6  100.66.4.73 (100.66.4.73)  29.798 ms 100.66.4.59 (100.66.4.59)
18.320 ms 100.66.4.201 (100.66.4.201)  13.686 ms
 7  100.65.11.193 (100.65.11.193)  0.586 ms 100.65.9.161
(100.65.9.161)  0.613 ms 100.65.10.161 (100.65.10.161)  0.706 ms
 8  205.251.244.222 (205.251.244.222)  1.514 ms 205.251.244.220
(205.251.244.220)  1.513 ms 205.251.245.237 (205.251.245.237)  1.554
ms
 9  54.239.110.26 (54.239.110.26)  19.964 ms 54.239.111.92
(54.239.111.92)  24.399 ms 54.239.111.94 (54.239.111.94)  19.988 ms
10  54.239.109.221 (54.239.109.221)  1.714 ms 54.239.109.151
(54.239.109.151)  1.630 ms 54.239.110.41 (54.239.110.41)  1.557 ms
11  * * lag-105.ear2.Washington12.Level3.net (4.16.74.17)  2.023 ms
12  2-1-3-332.bear1.Russia2.Level3.net (213.242.122.101)  138.540 ms
138.255 ms  138.535 ms

ᐧ

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Marshall, Quincy <Quincy.Marshall at reged.com
> wrote:

> Began investigating packet loss and latency to Russia earlier this
> morning. Issue appears to be hit or miss and affecting more than others
> certain traffic types (lower priority?).
>
> Are there any Level 3 engineer who can provide details/assistance?
> Anyone seeing anything similar?
>
> Host                    Nr      Loss %  Sent    Recv    Best    Avrg
> Worst   Last
> 81.23.112.129                1       0       55      55      1       5
>    44      2
> 81.23.112.33            2       0       55      55      2       7
>  47      5
> 93.174.247.242          3       0       55      55      2       7
>  47      3
> 93.174.247.241          4       0       55      55      2       15
> 194     3
> 213.242.122.101 5       2       51      50      9       13      60      10
> 4.69.140.226            6       5       47      45      165     260
>  659     223
> 4.69.140.226            7       5       47      45      165     264
>  665     213
> 166.90.118.222          8       0       55      55      166     171
>  213     171
> 209.59.28.22            9       0       55      55      166     171
>  216     171
>
> Report is from earlier this AM... seeing ~15% at the trouble point now.
>
> Q. Marshall | RegEd | phone: 919.653.5431  | ITS-771 |
> quincy.marshall at reged.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
> safely by Mimecast.
>  For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Joe Flowers

Senior Systems Engineer

512.666.0611

jflowers at atlassian.com


<http://atlassian.com/careers>



More information about the NANOG mailing list