New ICANN registrant change process

Wed Jul 6 19:48:49 UTC 2016

On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:23:04 -0400, Christopher Morrow said:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
>
> > Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for
> > Registries to deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams
> > of complaints.
> >
> >
> <devils advocate hat>
> On what metric? Pure volume? Percent of registrations? type of complaint by
> similar x/y?
> </devils advocate hat>
>
> there are 'lots of complaints' against some registrars, but if you have
> ~20% of the .TLD market you're prone to get more volume than a 1%er, right?
> Also, this isn't REALLY the registrY's problem is it?

Jay definitely said 'registRARS'.  And yes, it *is* the registrar's problem
to ensure they aren't selling thousands of domain registrations to known
spammers and other miscreants.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160706/d8bb68ce/attachment.sig>