New ICANN registrant change process
Mel Beckman
mel at beckman.org
Mon Jul 4 18:35:37 UTC 2016
I've worked behind the scenes for more than one of these outfits. I can tell you that domain registrars are basically printing money. On the other hand, I've also been the victim of domain hijacking. I can tell you that the domain registrars involved were less than useless in reversing the obviously fraudulent transactions. They basically said "Not our problem. Deal with it."
That's on top of the other obviously unethical practices by registrars, such as seizing nonexistent domain names following a prospective buyer's whois search, sluggardly unlocking of domains, etc.
Something had to be done. Now it has been.
To the registers whining about this change:
Not my problem. Deal with it.
-mel beckman
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 10:55 AM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
>
> I'll go ahead and assume I wasn't the last person to get this memo (courtesy
> Lauren Weinstein's PRIVACY Digest):
>
> https://opensrs.com/blog/2016/06/icanns-new-transfer-policy-will-impact-business-customers/
>
> It does seem that this is going to make life difficult for a bunch of pretty
> normal business processes.
>
> If you didn't know about it either... ask yourself why not.
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
> Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
More information about the NANOG
mailing list