Peering Exchange

Tue Jan 26 19:46:11 UTC 2016

On Tue 2016-Jan-26 13:30:41 -0600, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:

>Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I'm fairly sure they're on the route servers.

...and have open peering policies with pretty low requirements.

https://peering.google.com/about/peering_policy.html
https://www.facebook.com/peering/

Gist:

Google (in NA and EU) asks for >100 mbps peak for bilateral peering, but 
are on route servers where present and are happy to dish out & pick up 
routes that way for anyone not pushing enough bits for direct sessions.

Facebook wants >50 mbps peak for bilateral peering, though I don't see them 
on route servers at e.g. the SIX.

-- 
Hugo

hugo at slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber
PGP fingerprint (B178313E):
CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319 1D77 9AB1 0FFD B178 313E

(also on Signal)

>Other than driving additional revenue by needing to buy ports to both or possible regulatory concerns, I'm not sure why these companies spin up an exchange for every new fad that comes along. They all just boil down to an Ethernet fabric.
>
>
>
>
>-----
>Mike Hammett
>Intelligent Computing Solutions
>http://www.ics-il.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160126/95136793/attachment.sig>