Re: TransPacific Partnership

[email protected] tglassey at earthlink.net
Tue Jan 5 23:28:11 UTC 2016


I wouldn't worry about it every byte if the surveillance data is tied to the patent fraud around Us6370629 imho.

Sent from my HTC

----- Reply message -----
From: "Matt Hoppes" <mhoppes at indigowireless.com>
To: "Tom Berryman" <Tom at connectivityit.com.au>
Cc: <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: TransPacific Partnership
Date: Sun, Jan 3, 2016 16:07

My understanding was if it all goes through here in the US as proposed ISPs would have to provide real time monitoring of data   Not as part of CALEA but as part of NSA surveilance. 

> On Jan 3, 2016, at 18:54, Tom Berryman <Tom at connectivityit.com.au> wrote:
> 
> G'Day Matt,
> 
> I'm here in Australia - and yes we are all well aware of the "benefits" of the TPP.
> 
> What do you mean by burned?
> As in the additional accounting and administration overhead of doing business with operators in TPP participating countries?
> 
> Also, will you be attending PTC?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Tom Berryman
> 
> 
> Tom Berryman | CTO
> Connectivity I.T. PTY LTD
> ABN: 41128650635
> 
> 1300 22 46 00 (+61356224600) | tom at connectivityit.com.au | AS-58511
> www.connectivityit.com.au | facebook.com/connectivityit | twitter.com/connectivityit
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
> Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: TransPacific Partnership
> 
> Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?


More information about the NANOG mailing list