PCH Peering Paper

Tue Feb 16 14:49:41 UTC 2016

On 2/12/16, 8:56 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Niels Bakker"
<nanog-bounces at nanog.org on behalf of niels=nanog at bakker.net> wrote:

>* bedard.phil at gmail.com (Phil Bedard) [Sat 13 Feb 2016, 01:40 CET]:
>>I was going to ask the same thing, since even for settlement free
>>peering between large content providers and eyeball networks there
>>are written agreements in place.  I would have no clue on the volume
>>percentage but it's not going to be near 99%.
>
>It's much closer to 99% than to 50%, though.

Any reference on that? I¹m wondering who (if anyone) is formally measuring
/ tracking this and seeing the exact trend over time.

Thanks
Jason