Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL.

Mon Dec 19 11:02:23 UTC 2016

Sorbs is a pretty good list. And I've been on the listed-side too. I personally would not use it to block, but I would give it 3 of the 5 points.

The anti-spam gang is never going to be perfect. But since (self)regulation is not working, we need them. I value them at the moment. The only thing you can do about it, is figuring a way to solve this security issue (called spam). 

Met vriendelijke groet,

David Hofstee

Deliverability Management
MailPlus B.V. Netherlands (ESP)

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Tom Beecher" <beecher at beecher.cc>
Aan: "Ken O'Driscoll" <ken at wemonitoremail.com>, nanog at nanog.org
Verzonden: Zondag 18 december 2016 20:08:05
Onderwerp: Re: Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL.

I tend to scratch my head at anyone still using SORBS at this point.

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 8:27 AM Ken O'Driscoll <ken at wemonitoremail.com>
wrote:

> On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 20:15 -0800, Large Hadron Collider wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have information on why this is, and if you represent SORBS
>
> > and/or GMX and/or both, would you please trouble yourself with
>
> > contacting me off-list?
>
>
>
> You can find out why an IP was listed via their lookup facility:
>
> http://www.
>
> sorbs.net/lookup.shtml
>
>
>
> You can request de-listing by opening a support request:
>
> http://www.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/support
>
>
>
> You don't need to be an IP block owner to request de-listing but you do
> need to be empowered to stop whatever caused the listing in the first
> place. Their support is very responsive.
>
>
>
> Ken.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ken O'Driscoll / We Monitor Email
>
> t: +353 1 254 9400 | w: www.wemonitoremail.com
>
>
>
>