WiFI on utility poles

Scott Helms khelms at zcorum.com
Thu Sep 10 15:00:41 UTC 2015


This sounds like a hypothetical complaint, AFAIK none of the members of the
CableWiFi consortium are deploying APs outside of their footprint.  Since
most of the APs use a cable modem for their backhaul it's not really
feasible to be without at least one broadband option (the cable MSO) and be
impaired by the CableWiFi APs.

Now, there is one potential exception to this I'm aware of which is
Comcast's Xfinity on Campus service, but I'd expect the number of colleges
they're servicing that aren't already getting cable broadband service to
approach zero.

http://www.philly.com/philly/business/20150909_Comcast_streams_onto_college_campuses.html

https://xfinityoncampus.com/login


Having said all of that, I'd agree that a good radio resource management
approach would benefit all of us, including the CableWiFi guys.

http://www.cablelabs.com/wi-fi-radio-resource-management-rrm/


Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:

>
> > On Sep 10, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
> >
> > 5 GHz noise levels affecting people whose primary means of Internet
> access is via fixed wireless .
> >
>
> This is a huge deal for those people like myself that depend on fixed
> wireless for access at home because there is no broadband available despite
> incentives given by cities and states and the federal government.
>
> The local WISPs are good at coordinating access in these ISM bands amongst
> themselves but when someone appears with a SSID without doing a peek at the
> spectrum (note: not a site survey, but actual spectrum view w/ waterfall,
> as site survey only checks for the channel width that the client radio is
> configured for, not al the 10, 15, 8, 30mhz wide variants).
>
> It’s just poor practice to show up and break something else because you
> can’t be bothered to notice the interference or noise floor you created.  I
> suspect the hardware that Comcast is using doesn’t notice this interference
> or adjacent channel issues.  With the FCC aiming to let cell carriers also
> clog the 5ghz ISM band it’s only going to get worse.
>
> - Jared



More information about the NANOG mailing list