NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector
Roland Dobbins
rdobbins at arbor.net
Wed Sep 2 10:11:25 UTC 2015
On 2 Sep 2015, at 16:48, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Those VLAN's and VRF's are following the same path as the global
> table, just in a different routing table. That is easy, and we do that
> already.
Sure. But it's better than mixing it in with customer traffic.
> Your assertion, before, was that the OoB network is physically
> separate from the routers it is supporting. This is less feasible at
> scale.
Ideally, it should be - that's what I was trying to get across. I
understand that this isn't free, either from a capex or opex
perspective.
-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list