NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

Tue Sep 1 15:59:14 UTC 2015

Roland is correct. With the caveat that your Internet customer traffic may flow over the fibers as your separate management circuits. You should aim for end to end physical diversity. This is all common sense, but laziness some times takes precedence.

Roderick Beck
Sales - Europe and the Americas
Hibernia Networks
http://www.hibernianetworks.com
Budapest and New York
36-30-859-5144
rod.beck at hibernianetworks.com

________________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 5:43 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

On 1 Sep 2015, at 22:39, Mark Tinka wrote:

> Have been doing so for years, no major drama.

Until there is.

;>

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>
This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately telephone or e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts or agreements referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia Networks has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.