Uptick in spam
Connor Wilkins
connorwilkins at ruggedinbox.com
Tue Oct 27 14:33:03 UTC 2015
On 2015-10-27 13:08, Ian Smith wrote:
> But that's not how SPF works. In SPF, the domain of the envelope
> header
> sender address is checked against that domain's sender policy. Since
> jdlabs.fr has no policy specified, a strict SPF policy at the NANOG
> server
> would have prevented this small issue.
No sane system rejects email based on the lack of a SPF policy.
If the domain had a policy ending in "-all" and the spam wasn't coming
from a source allowed by the policy then it should be marked as failing,
held for moderator review, or rejected.
--
“Simply stated, we have a new formula for Coke.” --- Roberto C.
Goizueta, Company Chairman, Coca-Cola
More information about the NANOG
mailing list