/27 the new /24

Fri Oct 9 11:09:18 UTC 2015

Agreed. Often times people forget that budgets aren't unlimited and not everyone is in One Wilshire, 350 Cermak or 60 Hudson. 

----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Jason Baugher" <jason at thebaughers.com> 
To: "James Jun" <james at towardex.com> 
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org> 
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 7:21:05 PM 
Subject: Re: /27 the new /24 

This thread, while originally interesting and helpful, seems to have 
degraded to a contest to see who can be the most arrogant, condescending 
and insulting. Congrats. 
On Oct 8, 2015 6:25 PM, "James Jun" <james at towardex.com> wrote: 

> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:45:38PM -0700, Mike wrote: 
> > 
> > NO, THERE IS NOT. We operate in rural and underserved areas and WE DO 
> > NOT HAVE realistic choices. Can you see me from your ivory tower? 
> 
> Who is your upstream provider? 
> 
> I think you're confused on how the IP transit industry works. 
> 
> If you want choices in your transit providers, you should get a transport 
> circuit (dark, wave or EPL) to a nearby carrier hotel/data center. Once 
> you do that, you will suddenly find that virtually almost everyone in the 
> competitive IP transit market will provide you with dual-stacked IPv4/IPv6 
> service. 
> 
> If you are buying DIA circuit from some $isp to your rural location that 
> you call "head-end" and are expecting to receive a competitive service, 
> and support for IPv6, well, then your expectations are either unreasonable, 
> ignorant or both. 
> 
> Best, 
> James 
> 