How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force rapid ipv6 adoption")

Tue Oct 6 18:36:02 UTC 2015

X.400 required a session key. IIRC you had to know the other side of the
mail exchange and do (weak, but of the time what we did) shared secret
swaps to bootstrap the protocol.

Of course, a cheat-sheet of 'your idea will not work because [ ]' kills it,
but I do recall with some fondness that in those days, basic hygiene
demanded you know who you sent mail to, and on whose behalf. For at least
some people.

-G

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Måns Nilsson <mansaxel at besserwisser.org>
wrote:

> Subject: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force
> rapid ipv6 adoption") Date: Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:06:34PM -0400 Quoting
> Rob McEwen (rob at invaluement.com):
> >
> > I welcome IPv6 adoption in the near future in all but one area: the
> sending
> > IPs of valid mail servers. Those need to stay IPv4 for as long as
> reasonably
> > possible.
> >
>
> Using the link-level address to distinguish between good and bad email
> content was always daunting at best. Thanks for pointing out that this
> flawed behaviour must cease.
>
> --
> Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
> MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
> Why is it that when you DIE, you can't take your HOME ENTERTAINMENT
> CENTER with you??
>