BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested

Sun Mar 15 23:44:01 UTC 2015

On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:14:05 -0400, Andrew Sullivan said:

> I also think that trying to pack more bits of information into the
> numbering system is a mistake.  But then, I would.  I think you look
> those sorts of things up (in the DNS, of course ;-) )

DANE? :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150315/658ad232/attachment.sig>