Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
Miles Fidelman
mfidelman at meetinghouse.net
Sun Mar 1 19:59:28 UTC 2015
Hey Barry - you ran some rather huge NNTP servers, back in the day, you
have any comments on this?
Scott Helms wrote:
>
> Miles,
>
> Usenet was normally asymmetrical between servers, even when server
> operators try to seed equally as being fed. It's a function of how a
> few servers are the source original content and how long individual
> servers choose (and have the disk) to keep specific content.
>
> It was never designed to have as many server nodes as you're
> describing and I'd imagine there's some nasty side effects if we tried
> get that many active servers going as we have customers.
>
> On Mar 1, 2015 10:25 AM, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman at meetinghouse.net
> <mailto:mfidelman at meetinghouse.net>> wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> Asymmetric measured where? Between client and server or between
> servers? I'm thinking the case where we each have a server
> running locally - how do you get a high level of asymmetry in a
> P2P environment?
>
> Miles Fidelman
>
>
>
> Scott Helms wrote:
>
>
> Anything based on NNTP would be extremely asymmetric without
> significant changes to the protocol or human behavior.
>
> We ran significant Usenet servers with binaries for nearly 20
> years and without for another 5 and the servers' traffic was
> heavily asymmetric.
>
> On Mar 1, 2015 9:11 AM, "Miles Fidelman"
> <mfidelman at meetinghouse.net
> <mailto:mfidelman at meetinghouse.net>
> <mailto:mfidelman at meetinghouse.net
> <mailto:mfidelman at meetinghouse.net>>> wrote:
>
> Aled Morris wrote:
>
>
> Sadly we don't have many "killer applications" for
> symmetric
> residential
> bandwidth, but that's likely because we don't have the
> infrastructure to
> incubate these applications.
>
>
> Come to think of it, if USENET software wasn't so
> cumbersome, I
> kind of wonder if today's "social network" would consist
> of home
> servers running NNTP - and I expect the traffic would be very
> symmetric. (For that matter, with a few tweaks, the USENET
> model
> would be great for "groupware" - anybody remember the Netscape
> communications server that added private newsgroups and
> authentication to the mix?)
>
> Miles Fidelman
>
>
>
> -- In theory, there is no difference between theory
> and practice.
> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
>
>
>
> --
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
>
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
More information about the NANOG
mailing list