Anycast provider for SMTP?

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 18:57:59 UTC 2015


On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:54 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> Okay, granted you can probably cover your corner case here with a
> priority 20 MX that leads to a unicast address on one of the two
> servers. SMTP can let the rare fellow with the bisected packet flow
> gracefully fall back.

but 'well behaved smtp clients' should already be falling back right?



More information about the NANOG mailing list