Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

Joe Maimon jmaimon at ttec.com
Wed Jul 15 23:35:56 UTC 2015



Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:20:08 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>>> That's the big difference - IPv6 has been designed to provide abundant
>>>> address space.
>>>
>>> There is no amount of fixed address space that can't be consumed with
>>> stupid allocation policies.
>>
>> True. However, are you making the argument that any of the current or
>> proposed allocation policies are, in fact, stupid in such a way that
>> this is likely?
>
> What seems like a great idea today becomes tomorrow's "what the f***
> were they thinking".
>
>

There will be ample evidence of what any and all of were saying. 
Thinking, maybe not.



More information about the NANOG mailing list