Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

Tue Jul 14 22:10:04 UTC 2015

Or wait ILNP/ILA https://lwn.net/Articles/647515/

> On 15 июля 2015 г., at 0:09, Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com> wrote:
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> As a business entity and not a provider, we wouldn't have even contemplated deploying IPv6 without PI addresses. The myth of easy renumbering and/or having multiple prefixes/address per host for failover still shows up from time to time, but mostly gets ignored (at least in the corporate world). Remember SHIM? 
> 
> Any reasonable size organization that expects reliable internet connections is going to go BGP/PI.
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Matthew Huff             | 1 Manhattanville Rd
> Director of Operations   | Purchase, NY 10577
> OTA Management LLC       | Phone: 914-460-4039
> aim: matthewbhuff        | Fax:   914-694-5669
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:50 PM
> To: Chuck Church
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
> 
>> What about dual-homed customers?  Or are they all expected to have their own
>> PI space?
> 
> This is IPv6.  Why shouldn't they have their own PI space?
> 
> R's,
> John