NTP versions in production use?

Ca By cb.list6 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 12 18:16:14 UTC 2015


On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata at gmail.com> wrote:

> I’m currently running a scan of the internet and querying NTP versions.
>
> I’ll publish the results of it on Github and mail them in here :)
>
>
Please don't.

Please see http://openntpproject.org/


>
>
>
> On 12/07/2015 15:15, "NANOG on behalf of Mike O'Connor" <
> nanog-bounces at nanog.org <javascript:;> on behalf of mjo at dojo.mi.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> >:Thanks, and I'm kinda stunned that folks are running such ancient
> >:versions of NTP.
> >
> >I suggest you get accustomed to being stunned.
> >
> >:https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/ReleaseTimeline
> >:
> >:4.2.0 was EOL'd in June of 2006, and we've fixed about 3,000 issues in
> >:the codebase since then.
> >
> >4.2.0 may have been EOL'd in 2006, but it was still shipping as the
> >default in FreeBSD until 2009.
> >
> >Out of those 3000 issues, only a tiny fraction are security-related
> >that would apply to JunOS.  I expect that they backport security and
> >other fixes as necessary, until some bigger engineering effort and|or
> >headache calls for a forklift/mass upgrade of things.
> >
> >
> >--
> > Michael J. O'Connor
> mjo at dojo.mi.org <javascript:;>
> >
> =--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--=
> >"Fire me, boy!"                                             -The Human
> Bullet
>
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list